top of page

Exploring the Ethical and Legal Challenges of NGO Involvement in Hamas' Terror Financing

The Perilous Intersection of NGOs and Hamas' Terror Financing




Introduction

The exploitation of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) for the purpose of terror financing is a pressing concern within the realms of global philanthropy and security. Groups like Hamas, officially designated as a terrorist organization by several international authorities, have demonstrated sophisticated methods of channeling funds under the guise of charitable work. This intricate challenge is magnified by the emergence of advanced technologies such as cryptocurrencies, which complicate the ethical landscape as we understand it—a concern profoundly echoed in Shoshana Zuboff's work "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism."

"We have turned a blind eye to this activity [Hamas' external funding] for more than a decade." Jonathan Schanzer. Former counter-terrorism financial analyst at the US Treasury Department

Hamas Sophisticated Use of NGOs




Hamas' operations leveraging NGOs for fundraising are multifaceted, involving the use of digital platforms to exploit the anonymity and versatility offered by the online financial systems. Two significant case studies, the Holy Land Foundation in the United States and Interpal in the United Kingdom, exemplify the cunning manipulation of NGO frameworks to support and sustain their operations.

1. The Holy Land Foundation: Once the largest Islamic charity in the United States, the Holy Land Foundation was implicated in channeling funds to Hamas. The 2001 shutdown of the charity by the U.S. government, followed by the conviction of its leaders, unveiled a vast network funneling charitable donations to support Hamas' social and political endeavors.

2. Interpal: This UK-based charity has faced scrutiny over alleged links to Hamas. Despite multiple investigations by the British Charity Commission which cleared it of wrongdoing, the charity remains under observation, reflecting the ongoing struggle to ensure NGO resources do not end up supporting terror activities.

How Hamas gets funded. - Euronews


International Implications and Response

The international community has received a stark warning from these episodes, leading to increased vigilance in NGO operations. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), while not a regulatory body, provides influential recommendations that guide countries in fortifying their defenses against the misuse of financial systems for terror financing. Despite these efforts, the rapid development of digital financial technologies, particularly cryptocurrencies, presents new challenges in the ongoing battle against such exploitation

Israel’s role*

Israel has taken a proactive stance on combating terror financing through NGOs. In October 2021, Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz designated six Palestinian NGOs as terrorist organizations, asserting that they were linked to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), which is recognised as a terrorist group by Israel, the United States, and the European Union. This move was part of Israel's broader efforts to disrupt the financial networks that support terrorist activities.

The decision to label these NGOs as terror organisations was rooted in intelligence that suggested their involvement in terror activities. The Israeli government has claimed that these organizations, which present themselves as humanitarian and civil society groups, served as covers for PFLP's financing and propaganda. According to Israeli officials, these NGOs received substantial funding from European countries and international organizations through methods of deception, and the funds were used to support PFLP's operations.

Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has been active in sharing information with other countries to substantiate the connections of these NGOs with the PFLP terror organization. The evidence, according to Israeli authorities, is detailed, pointing to prior connections of these organisations with the PFLP.

Israel's legal framework for such designations is in line with international law, including United Nations resolutions and conventions that relate to terror activities. For instance, UN Security Council Resolution 1373 obliges states to criminalise the provision or collection of funds intended to be used for terrorist acts. Israel's Counter-Terrorism Law 5776-2016 empowers the Ministry of Defense to designate a group as a terrorist organization, with provisions for due process, including the opportunity to present arguments against such designations and to appeal to Israel's Supreme Court.

The implications of these designations are significant as they shed light on the challenges international donors face when providing funding to NGOs operating in conflict zones. There is a risk that funds intended for legitimate humanitarian assistance could be diverted to support terror activities. This situation underscores the importance of rigorous due diligence and monitoring mechanisms to ensure that NGO funding is not misappropriated.

The actions taken by Israel reflect the complex and ongoing struggle to prevent the exploitation of the non-profit sector for terror financing while also navigating the potential political and humanitarian consequences of such designations.

Israel’s Contribution to Strengthen Global Cooperation on AML/CTF

Israel has taken significant steps to strengthen its AML/CTF framework since its 2018 mutual evaluation by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The country has made progress in addressing technical compliance deficiencies and is now compliant on 16 of the FATF Recommendations and largely compliant on 19 others. Israel's AML/CTF system is noted for being effective in many areas, particularly in understanding its risks, investigating and prosecuting money laundering and terrorist financing, and in using financial intelligence to prevent crime. However, there is an emphasis on the need for Israel to focus more on supervision and the implementation of preventive measures.

Regulatory and Ethical Dynamics

In response to these challenges, there is a critical need to:

- Develop adaptable regulations that can respond to the evolving digital financial landscape.

- Maintain ethical integrity in the surveillance of financial transactions, ensuring respect for individual privacy and rights.

- Foster international collaboration to standardise practices aimed at preventing the misuse of NGOs for terror financing.

Strategic Actions and Reflection

In light of these concerns, key strategies might include:

- Implementing rigorous due diligence within the NGO sector.

- Balancing transparency and ethical considerations in financial monitoring.

- Empowering and lobbying international bodies like the FATF to provide up-to-date and actionable recommendations that keep pace with technological advancements and reflect unprecedented scenarios of “sustained war”.

Conclusion

The use of NGOs for terror financing, particularly by Hamas, underscores the need for a concerted approach that is both proactive and reactive. It calls for a forensic level of scrutiny, combined with strategic collaboration across borders, to protect the integrity of global philanthropy from being overshadowed by terrorism.

Reflections:

- How can we enhance the capabilities of international and national bodies to detect and prevent the diversion of NGO funds towards terror financing?

- What steps can be taken to ensure that the pursuit of financial transparency does not infringe upon lawful privacy and individual rights?

 

These resources provide a foundation for understanding the complex interplay between NGO operations, terror financing, and the necessary global response to this pervasive challenge.

 

References

 

1. "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism" by Shoshana Zuboff - Zuboff's seminal work that delves into the ethics of technology and surveillance.

2. FATF Reports and Publications - Essential readings for understanding the international standards on combating money laundering and terrorist financing.

3. “The Holy Land Foundation Trial: The Unintended Consequences” by Jeffrey Breinholt - An article detailing the trial and its implications for NGO funding.

4. “NGO Law Monitor: United Kingdom” by The International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL) - Information on the legal framework governing NGOs in the UK, especially in relation to counter-terrorism and financing.

5. “Cryptocurrency and Money Laundering: A Terrorist Perspective” by David Carlisle - An exploration of how cryptocurrencies are used for money laundering and terrorist financing.

6. "Terrorist Diversion: A Guide to Prevention and Detection for NGOs" By Oliver MayPaul Curwell

* Reports and analysis provided by JNS.org, the Jewish Policy Center, and NGO Monitor.

 

Further Reading

 

1. "Terrorism Financing and the Islamic State" by Matthew Levitt - Provides an in-depth look at the financial strategies of terrorist organizations.

2. “Countering Terrorist Financing: Why ‘Follow the Money’ Fails” by Peter R. Neumann - A critique of current approaches to countering terrorist financing.

3. “Artificial Intelligence in Financial Markets: Cutting Edge Applications for Risk Management, Portfolio Optimization and Economics” by Christian L. Dunis et al. - Insight into the application of AI in financial markets.

4. “Financing of Terrorism: Sources, Methods, and Channels” by Michael Freeman - A comprehensive overview of the various methods and channels used for terrorist financing.

5. “The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook” by Walter W. Powell and Richard Steinberg - Offers discussions on the role of NGOs, their management, and the challenges they face.

 

Organisations for Consultation and Reports

1. Financial Action Task Force (FATF) - Provides global standards and reports on money laundering and terrorist financing.

2. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) - U.S. Department of the Treasury - Offers information on sanctions and entities involved in terrorist financing.

3. Europol - Publishes reports on terrorism financing and organized crime within the EU.

4. National Crime Agency (NCA) - UK - Provides insights into financial crimes and terrorist financing activities.

5. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) - U.S. - Issues advisories and reports on money laundering and terrorist financing.

6. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) - Offers research and analysis on global issues related to terrorism financing.

7. The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units - Shares information on illicit financial activities.

8. International Monetary Fund (IMF) - Publishes reports on global financial stability, including aspects of terrorism financing.

9. Bank for International Settlements (BIS) - Provides financial insights, including those on global security and terrorism financing.

10. Congressional Research Service (CRS) - U.S. - Offers in-depth research reports to Congress, some of which are publicly available.

11. RAND Corporation - Frequently publishes research on terrorism and national security.

12. Brookings Institution - Offers research and analysis on various global issues, including terrorism financing.

Comentarios


IMG_4918.JPG

Welcome to the Arakura Blog

Welcome to our exploration at the intersection of philanthropy, leadership, and artificial intelligence. As a philanthropic advisor with a focus on the transformative potential of AI, this space is dedicated to uncovering insights that drive meaningful impact. Through my studies at Oxford University's Saïd Business School, I've gained a unique perspective on how strategic giving and innovative technology can shape a better future. Join me in this journey, where we'll challenge conventions and discover new pathways to effective philanthropy. Your thoughts and experiences are invaluable to this dialogue—let's engage and learn together.

Post Archive 

Tags

bottom of page